PM Khan visits Prime Minister’s Complaint Cell

Respected Prime Minister Imran Khan, I am a great fan of you and look towards you with a hope to see a real positive change in the life of Pakistani people. I would request you that you need to make a system thereby once your vision is transformed into a policy and then implementation procedure by the bureaucracy for making policies and implementing it is a risky affair for your repute. The policy making setup and then its implementation can be maligned by the concerned people.
A simple example is the collection of life time token money for 1000cc and below vehicles. Yes this measure will enable collection of sizable money in the year 2019~20; but what grave affects it has for the low income car owners of older models has to be realized by you and your policy makers/ implementers. These poor people majority of whom have been looking towards you as their savior; who have busted up old cars are asked to pay Rs 25000/- if non filers and Rs 21000/- if filers. My humble request is that kindly change the implementation of this policy as follows:-

“On purchase of any new vehicle upto 1000cc the life time token money would be charged. All owners of old cars upto 1000cc will be given an option if they would like to pay one time life token or they would like to continue paying the annual token money”.

Aoa. our highly respectable prime minister had again done a wrong decision by issuing a time table schedule of government employees during ramzan form 10.00 to 4.00 pm. how could it possible to perform duty in the holy month of ramzan. kindly change the time from 8.00 to 2.00 pm.
thanks

Ramzan Timings for the federal employees are again difficult i.e. 9.00 to 3.30. kindly change these timings. after officials duties, the reaching time will be after 4 o clock. then how can perform ramzan well.
kindly change the time upto 2.0 o clock,
thanks

Dear Mr. Prime Minister-AOA ! 08-04-2018
Presently, the further sales tax @ 3% on supply of goods to non registered persons is being charged by FBR.
Sir It is humbly notified, that as most of the importers are also supplying the finished goods to the end consumers who are normally non registered and they are paying further sales tax @ 3% on supply to non registered end consumers at the filing of sale tax return on each month and some officials of the FBR are giving undue advantages to some importers causing the others to defeat in the market due to increasing of cost of import as some of them are not paying further tax @ 3% on supply to non registered.
Sir i suggest, that as the value added tax is being charged at the stage of import, if the futher tax @ 3% is also charged at the import stage, the way of corruption can be stopped as the law is being misused by some importers in connivance with the official of the FBR for the personal illegal gains.
Thanks and Regards.

kindly sir office timings change kar den

Asslam o Alikum Respected Prime Minister Ma Govt k us school ma job krti ju k 2017 ma PEF k unedr hoye ur ab ais ko PEF k patner PEIMA (PSSP) k under jis ko AFSS chla rehi ur ye hm ko pay bht hi km dete hain hmari pay 7700 hai jb k meri qualification M.A M.ed hai.
ye ju thuri c salary di jati hai wo b 3 time se ni milti. ur hmare sath behaviour b bht insulted hai plz help us. thanks

Pls makes more law against fake cheque issue.

Thanx

Respected prime minister i want to bring your attention towards a very serious problem that is being faced in our society ,that is chitt tax system on rickshaws in shahdra ,muredky & various cities of Punjab ..chitt tax is being collected by pti MPA & MNA named Brigadier Rahat iman ullah bhatti Mna of tehsil shadra .30 rupees per day on a rickshaw is being collected daily on the name of government tax
i hope that you will pay attention to this problem
please pay attention to this problem

• Working on contract basis
October 18, 2018

The matter such as Punjab government’s discontinuing pay packages/ market based salaries of the government employees serving in public sector companies and all other government organizations in the province, has been discussed at length and because of being backed by high ups, finance department Punjab, made haste while issuing circular/notification in this regard, putting certain legalities aside, giving rise to apprehensions and confusions.
Government’s firm stance to make accountability work without any discrimination appears to run contrary to what generally is maintained, as the policy itself is discriminatory, making a specified class (public employees) deprived of basic constitutional and human rights. The policy could be applied to public employees working on deputation basis or on project posts only and not to contract employees (receiving pays that commensurate with qualification and experience) having merely lien over their substantive posts, as service rules or any other law do not restrict permanent government employees from applying against a properly advertised post in any of the government organizations, and they may appear in test/ interview and join the post, if selected, on contract basis as per terms and conditions agreed upon.
What to be of the confirmed government employees in Punjab who, on meeting the set criteria have been selected on higher posts, and are working on contract basis in public sector organizations at fixed salaries for years, while now, not being paid as per contract (from July1) and asked to be provided pay slips of their substantive post (on which they worked earlier) so that be paid the salary of their substantive post (of lower grade), working on higher post, merely because of having lien over their substantive post, despite the fact the post they held now a days is non-pensionable being purely contractual. This makes them stressed as their juniors as well as colleagues (from private sector) working in the same government organizations are being paid much better to them and treated to be higher in rank/grade as well. Equity and rule of uniformity demand the employees to be treated equally and be not discriminated against within the same organization.
It is incomprehensible as to why only confirmed/permanent government employees are not entitled (as per circular) to receive lump sum fixed salaries. Treating in such a way purely contravenes the Contract Policy, 2004 of Government of Punjab and even makes contracts void altogether that is clear breach of contract by the government. Double standards, by no means are fair to be applied. It is suggested to please reconsider the policy and direct the authorities concerned to treat the employees as per contracts by paying them salary of the post they held and not of the substantive post (held earlier) so that they may work satisfactorily as usual.
MAHER MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE SIAL,
Lahore, October 5.